There is a growing public concern over the issue of saving endanger species. The speaker in the title statement advocate that there is no need to spend money and use hunam resources to protect them for the reason that the research in geological shows that the extinction of of many species is as a result of natural, not human beings. In the last analysis, I argue that although the reasons of extinction of many species is not because of human, we still need to do such works for the profits we could get from these.

In the first place, the endanger species are more improtant to the research in science or geological and other regions. For instance, the reasearch in giant salamander which live only in the Changjiang River. Giant salamander have an improtant place in the academic research but even cloud say that no use to human at all. If we quit the research, may be mean nothing to the humankind, but in the academic world, people lost an very important research object in the nature, which makes people know less about the world.

In the second place, some kind of endanger species may be the key balance of animals and the nature, with out them, more kind of animals or foliages many be extincted. There is an evidence that in some place of china, people like to eat frog as a delicious food. But frog is the pest killer in the farm land. Those largue number of death of frogs make the pest did not feal afraid of their natural enemies and could eat the things they like, the emblements, which at last make human beings to be big losers. Altough the frog is not the endanger specie, but the instance also shows that the natrue is in an balance that some kind of species`s extinction will also harm to human beings. So the saving is necessary not only for those species but also for human beings.

Last but not least, because of the largue useing of natural resources, the nature is bacame increasly bad for all the living things in the earth, which alos could be concluded that it is human made the nartual more unfit for those endanger species, so the saving is not only for those species but also good for humen. I have already claimed that without the balance of nature, even if it is man, they also cloun not live.

In conclution, I hold that in comparsion with the profits we cloud get from the saving of extinct species, the cost in money and job is negligible. So we should continue our work in saving those kind of things.

mmtea 2005-06-07 00:29 写得那么赞啊

幽蓝的眼睛 2005-06-07 08:56 增的系才华横溢啊～～～

mjlive! 2005-06-07 09:21 明显你们都没有看-,- 这篇作文要是能到３我就跳楼的……

怪怪 2005-06-07 10:31 最近要考英语，不要刺激我！！！

幽蓝的眼睛 2005-06-07 12:55 呵呵看来才华横溢的你还很谦虚的哇

诸葛贼 2005-06-07 16:42 嘿嘿，反正我是看不懂～

 

2010年搬迁时的ps

看到这篇文章我自己都震惊了，原来那个时候能写出这么一大段E文，真的要回去面墙思考下了。

标签：

转载注明：转自Mao